GIULIANI v. POLYSCIENCES INC.

Filing 15

ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE DKT. NO. 11, IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: DEFT'S MOTION TO STRIKE IS GRANTED & PARAGRAPHS 34-37, 39(g) & 41-44 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DEFT' S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS I & II OF THE COMPLAINT IS DENIED. DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT III OF THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED & THIS CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 7/31/17. 7/31/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS GIULIANI v. POLYSCIENCES, INC. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1705 ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2017, upon consideration of defendant Polysciences, Inc.’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to strike, Dkt. No. 11, plaintiff Thomas Giuliani’s response, Dkt. No. 12 and defendant’s reply brief, Dkt. No. 13, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendant’s motion to strike is GRANTED and paragraphs 34–37, 39(g) and 41– 44 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts I and II of the complaint is DENIED. 3. Defendant’s motion to dismiss Count III of the complaint is GRANTED and this claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. /s/ Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr. THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?