DIXON v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY REMAND AND DEEMED MOOT WITH RESPECT TO ALL OTHER REQUESTS FOR RELIEF. THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. THE REMAINING MOTIONS ARE DEEMED MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 6/8/2017. 6/9/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANNE M. DIXON,
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.,
AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Remand (Doc. No. 5), Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 5), Defendants Steven C.
Feinstein and Zenstein Ballard, P.C.’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motions (Doc. Nos. 7, 10), and
the remaining Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motions (Docket No. 9), it is hereby
1. Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. No. 5) is GRANTED with respect to the Motion for Summary
Remand and DEEMED MOOT with respect to all other requests for relief;
2. The case is REMANDED to the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas;
3. The remaining motions on the docket (Doc. Nos. 3-4, 12) are DEEMED MOOT; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes, including statistics.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?