"DOE" v. WM OPERATING, LLC et al
Filing
39
ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. NOS. 20, 25 & 29) ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS UNDER THE NEW YORK STATE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW (COUNTS X AND XI) ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, THE MOTIONS ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 8/7/2017. 8/7/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FRANK “DOE”
:
:
v.
:
:
WM OPERATING, LLC d/b/a/
:
MEADOWVIEW REHABILITATION AND :
NURSING CENTER, et al.
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-2204
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the motions to dismiss
by defendants John Chapman and WM Operating, LLC d/b/a Meadowview Rehabilitation and
Nursing Center, Dkt. No. 20, defendant Premier Healthcare Management, LLC, Dkt. No. 25, and
defendant Rest Haven Care Corp., Dkt. No. 29, and the responses by plaintiff Frank “Doe,” Dkt.
Nos. 24, 33 & 34, it is ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN
PART, as follows:
(1)
Plaintiff’s claims under the New York State Human Rights Law (Counts X and
XI) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
(2)
In all other respects, the motions are DENIED.
s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?