KING v. BURR et al

Filing 17

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(1) IS GRANTED, AND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 8/24/17. 8/24/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Daniel KING, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 17-2315 Judge Charles B. BURR, II et al., Defendants. ORDER And NOW, this 24th day of August 2017, for the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) (ECF 10), is GRANTED, and the Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF 13) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk shall close this case. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson__________ Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J. O:\Jessica.2016\King v. Burr\Order Re Motion to Dismiss.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?