RICHARDSON v. PIERCE et al

Filing 12

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ARE GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/23/2017. 10/23/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAVID D. RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-2393

v.
KEVIN PIERCE, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Complaint
(Doc. No. 1), Defendants District Attorney Thomas Hogan and Assistant District Attorney Kevin
Pierce’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2), Plaintiff’s Response to
Defendants Pierce/Hogan’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 5), Defendants
District Attorney Thomas Hogan and Kevin Pierce’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Brief in Opposition
(Doc. No. 6), Defendant County of Chester’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant
to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. No. 7), and in accordance with
the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. Nos. 2, 7) are GRANTED.
2. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/ s / J oel H. S l om s k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.