GEARY et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Filing 12

ORDER THAT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 4 ) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND COUNT V OF THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 7/31/2017. 7/31/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALFRED GEARY and PATRICIA
GEARY,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 17-2468

ORDER
AND NOW, this

31st day of July, 2017, upon consideration of Wells Fargo

Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Doc. No. 4), Plaintiffs Alfred
Geary and Patricia Geary’s Response to Wells Fargo’s Motion, and Wells Fargo’s Reply in
Further Support of its Motion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is
further ORDERED that:
1.

Count II (Violation of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection
Law) of the Complaint is dismissed with PREJUDICE; and

2.

Count V of the Complaint (Violation of the Truth in Lending Act) is
dismissed with PREJUDICE.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
SENIOR JUDGE