GEARY et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
ORDER THAT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 4 ) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND COUNT V OF THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 7/31/2017. 7/31/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALFRED GEARY and PATRICIA
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
AND NOW, this
31st day of July, 2017, upon consideration of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Doc. No. 4), Plaintiffs Alfred
Geary and Patricia Geary’s Response to Wells Fargo’s Motion, and Wells Fargo’s Reply in
Further Support of its Motion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is
further ORDERED that:
Count II (Violation of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection
Law) of the Complaint is dismissed with PREJUDICE; and
Count V of the Complaint (Violation of the Truth in Lending Act) is
dismissed with PREJUDICE.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?