LEE v. LINK et al

Filing 49

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS CYNTHIA LINK, LAURA BANTA, AND JAMELLE NORRIS'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, PLAINTIFF MICHAEL MO'HAMMED LEE'S WRITTEN OPPOSITION THERETO, AND THE PARTIES' PRESENTATION AT THE JUNE 7, 2 019, ORAL ARGUMENT AND EVIDENTIARY HEARING, AND FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, IT IS ORDERED THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT 1. JUDGEMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS LINK AND BANTA ON COUNT 1 OF LEE'S AMENDED COMPLAINT. MOTION IS DENIED AS TO COUNT 2. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 6/13/2019. 6/14/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(dmc, )

IN THE IDJITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTER.il\J DISTRICT OF PEI\'NSYL VANIA

rc,-g PZ:o··

No. 17-2528

Ii 4,,,,~'

V.

WARDEN C. LINK, et al.

CIVIL ACTION

JUN 13; 2019

MICHAEL MO'HAMMED LEE

r~~·~.- .,·,4.:. ·~~ C!erk
~~
·!1,

~

-----:.'.'21'1 '"'hrk
r'~ ...;. ..,

ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of Defendants Cynthia Link,
Laura Banta, and Jamelle Norris's Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff Michael
Mo'Hammed Lee's written opposition thereto, and the parties' presentation at the June 7, 2019,
oral argument and evidentiary hearing, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying
Memorandum, it is ORDERED the Motion (Document 34) is GRA~TED in part and DENIED
in part as follows:
I.

The Motion is GRANTED as to Count 1. Judgment 1s entered m favor of

Defendants Link and Banta on Count 1 of Lee's Amended Complaint.
2.

The Motion is DE~IED as to Count 2.
BY THE COURT: