A.B. et al v. TREDYFFRIN/EASTTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al

Filing 57

ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS TREDYFFRIN EASTTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT AND AMY A. MEISINGER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. A CONFERENCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF SCHEDULING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN DUE COURSE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 10/23/20. 10/23/20 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL )

Case 2:17-cv-02581-JD Document 57 Filed 10/23/20 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
D.B.,

CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff,
v.

TREDYFFRIN/EASTTOWN SCHOOL
DISTRICT, and
AMY A. MEISENGER,
Defendants.

NO. 17-2581

ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2020, upon consideration of Motion of
Defendants, Tredyffrin Easttown School District [“TESD”] and Amy A. Meisinger [“Principal
Meisinger”] for Summary Judgment (Document No. 43, filed March 30, 2020), Plaintiff’s
Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Tredyffrin/Easttown School
District and Amy A. Meisinger (Document No. 45, filed April 20, 2020), and Reply Brief of
Defendants, Tredyffrin Easttown School District and Amy A. Meisinger to Plaintiff’s Response
to the Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 52, filed May 13, 2020), IT IS
ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART, as follows:
1. That part of defendant’s Motion that seeks summary judgment on plaintiff’s
§ 1983 municipal liability claim against TESD for failure to train is DENIED;
2. That part of defendant’s Motion that seeks summary judgment on plaintiff’s
§ 1983 supervisory liability claim against Principal Meisinger under a theory of knowledge and
acquiescence is GRANTED;

Case 2:17-cv-02581-JD Document 57 Filed 10/23/20 Page 2 of 2

3. That part of defendant’s Motion that seeks summary judgment on plaintiff’s
§ 1983 supervisory liability claim against Principal Meisinger under a theory of deliberate
indifference by failing to train is DENIED; and
4. That part of defendant’s Motion that seeks summary judgment on plaintiff’s Title
IX claim is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a conference for the purpose of scheduling further
proceedings will be conducted in due course.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.

2