LEAK v. CLARK et al
Filing
74
ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 4/13/20. 4/14/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIAM LEAK,
CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CLARK,
et al., THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF
THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA AND
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,
Defendants.
NO. 17-2608
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 202020, upon careful and independent consideration
of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice and Petitioner filing no Objections thereto,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice;
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and
4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Wendy Beetlestone, J.
_______________________________
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?