NORR v. BERRYHILL

Filing 29

ORDER THAT PLFF'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. NO. 23) ARE OVERRULED; REPORT & RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 20) IS APPROVED & ADOPTED; PLFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW (DOC. NO. 14) IS DENIED; & THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 6/26/19. 6/28/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TIMOTHY K. NORR, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant. : : : : : : : Civ. No. 17-2701 JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2019, after careful and independent review of the initial Complaint (Doc. No. 3), the Government’s Answer (Doc. No. 8), the administrative record (Doc. No. 9), Plaintiff’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Doc. No. 14), the Government’s Response (Doc. No. 15), Judge Sitarski’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20), Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. No. 23), and the Government’s Response (Doc. No. 26), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. No. 23) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. Plaintiff’s Request for Review (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED; and 4. The CLERK OF COURT shall CLOSE this case. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Paul S. Diamond ______________________ Paul S. Diamond, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?