SATELL v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY

Filing 44

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 32 , IS GRANTED AS THERE ARE NO GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT OF FEDERAL LAW PRECLUDING JUDGMENT IN DEFENDANT'S FAVOR DISMISSING THE PLAINTIFF'S DUE PROCESS AND UNTIMELY RACE DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 1/3/18. 1/3/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION STEPHEN SATELL N0.17-2774 v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of January 2018, upon considering Defendant's Motion for summary judgment (ECF Doc. No. 32), Plaintiffs prose Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 37) with supporting materials, Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 39), Plaintiffs pro se Sur-reply filed upon leave (ECF Doc. No. 42) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED as there are no genuine issues of material fact of federal law precluding judgment in Defendant's favor dismissing the Plaintiffs due process and untimely race discrimination claims. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?