SATELL v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
Filing
44
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 32 , IS GRANTED AS THERE ARE NO GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT OF FEDERAL LAW PRECLUDING JUDGMENT IN DEFENDANT'S FAVOR DISMISSING THE PLAINTIFF'S DUE PROCESS AND UNTIMELY RACE DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 1/3/18. 1/3/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION
STEPHEN SATELL
N0.17-2774
v.
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
ORDER
AND NOW, this
3rd
day of January 2018, upon considering Defendant's Motion for
summary judgment (ECF Doc. No. 32), Plaintiffs prose Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 37) with
supporting materials, Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 39), Plaintiffs pro se Sur-reply filed
upon leave (ECF Doc. No. 42) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is
ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED as there are no genuine
issues of material fact of federal law precluding judgment in Defendant's favor dismissing the
Plaintiffs due process and untimely race discrimination claims.
The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?