SATELL v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S 3 MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. WE GRANT THE MOTION AS TO THE BREACH OF CONTRACT AND DEPRIVATION OF DUE PROCESS CLAIMS BUT GIVE PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, ON OR BEFORE 8/4/20 17; WE DENY THE MOTION AS TO THE TILE VI CLAIM; AND, ABSENT PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER PARAGRAPH 1, DEFENDANT SHALL FILE AN ANSWER ON OR BEFORE 8/8/2017. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 7/25/17. 7/25/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AND NOW, this 25 1h day of July 2017, upon considering Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(ECF Doc. No. 3), Plaintiffs Response (ECF Doc. No. 4), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 5)
and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF
Doc. No. 3) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:
We grant the Motion as to the breach of contract and deprivation of due process
claims but give Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint, if possible, on or before August 4,
We deny the Motion as to the Title VI claim; and,
Absent Plaintiff's filing of an amended complaint under Paragraph 1, Defendant
shall file an answer on or before August 8, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?