HEED et al v. UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES INC et al
Filing
70
ORDER THAT LEAD PLAINTIFFS MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e) TO ALTER OR AMEND THE COURT'S ORDER DISMISSING LEAD PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT, AND REQUESTING LEAVE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/29/20. 4/29/20 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL. (JL)
Case 2:17-cv-02817-JHS Document 70 Filed 04/29/20 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 456 PENSION
FUND, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-2817
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2020, upon consideration of Lead Plaintiffs’
Motion Pursuant to Rule 59(e) to Alter or Amend the Court’s Order Dismissing Lead
Plaintiffs’ Complaint, [and] Requesting Leave for Lead Plaintiffs to Amend the
Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) (Doc. No. 62), Defendants’ Opposition to
Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. No. 63), Lead Plaintiffs’ Reply in Further Support of Their
Motion (Doc. No. 67), and in accordance with the Opinion issued this day, it is
ORDERED that Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. No. 62) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joel H. Slomsky
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?