HEED et al v. UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES INC et al

Filing 70

ORDER THAT LEAD PLAINTIFFS MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e) TO ALTER OR AMEND THE COURT'S ORDER DISMISSING LEAD PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT, AND REQUESTING LEAVE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/29/20. 4/29/20 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL. (JL)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02817-JHS Document 70 Filed 04/29/20 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS LOCAL 456 PENSION FUND, et al., CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-2817 Plaintiffs, v. UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2020, upon consideration of Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion Pursuant to Rule 59(e) to Alter or Amend the Court’s Order Dismissing Lead Plaintiffs’ Complaint, [and] Requesting Leave for Lead Plaintiffs to Amend the Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) (Doc. No. 62), Defendants’ Opposition to Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. No. 63), Lead Plaintiffs’ Reply in Further Support of Their Motion (Doc. No. 67), and in accordance with the Opinion issued this day, it is ORDERED that Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. No. 62) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?