DURST v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

Filing 61

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT ON ALL CLAIMS IN PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 9/21/2018. 9/21/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES DURST v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 17-2933 ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant City of Philadelphia’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff James Durst’s opposition thereto, Defendant’s reply, and the parties’ presentations at the September 12, 2018, oral argument on the Motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED the Motion (Document 22) is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant on all claims in Plaintiff’s Complaint. It is further ORDERED: 1. Defendant’s Motion in Limine (Document 41) is DISMISSED as MOOT. 2. Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine (Documents 42 and 43) are DISMISSED as MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Juan R. Sánchez . Juan R. Sánchez, C.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?