DOLTON v. BERRYHILL

Filing 11

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. DOLTON'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY BY SEPARATE ORDER FILED CONTEMPORANEOUSLY. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 5/13/19. 5/15/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALICE M. DOLTON v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 17-3096 ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of May, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff Alice M. Dolton’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security’s response thereto, and Plaintiff’s reply, and after careful and independent review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, to which no objections have been filed,1 it is ORDERED: • The Report and Recommendation (Document 9) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; • Dolton’s Request for Review (Document 6) is DENIED; • Judgment is entered affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security by separate order filed contemporaneously; and • 1 The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on August 31, 2018, together with a Notice from the Clerk of Court advising the parties of their obligation to file any objections within fourteen days after service of the Notice. See Local R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV(b) (“Any party may object to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings, recommendations or report under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) . . . within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof.”). As of today’s date, no objections have been filed. BY THE COURT: /s/ Juan R. Sánchez Juan R. Sánchez, C.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?