WATSON v. DELBALSO et al

Filing 22

ORDERED AS FOLLOWS THAT PETITIONERS OBJECTIONS (ECF NO. 16) ARE DENIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS COURTS ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 12) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 1) IS DENIED AND DISMISSED; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND, THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 7/16/20. 7/16/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-03191-CDJ Document 22 Filed 07/16/20 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MYRON WATSON Petitioner, v. : : THERESA DELBALSO; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE; and, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA Respondents. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-3191 : : ORDER : AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 2020, upon careful and independent consideration of: Petitioner Myron Watson’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1); the Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 8), Petitioner’s Traverse (ECF No. 9); the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley (ECF No. 12); Petitioner’s Objections thereto (ECF No. 16); and, the Response in Opposition to said Objections (ECF No. 20), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) Petitioner’s Objections (ECF No. 16) are DENIED in accordance with this Court’s accompanying Memorandum; (2) The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; (3) The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED AND DISMISSED; (4) There is no probable cause for the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability; and, (5) The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ C. Darnell Jones, II J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?