HALL v. AFSCME et al
Filing
6
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND ORIGINAL COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. THE COURT WILL TREAT PLAINTIFF'S FILING AS AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. PLAINTIFF IS GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C.DARNELL JONES ON 9/25/17. 9/26/17 ENTERED AND MAILED TO PRO SE.(jl, )
....
/_ \Y
,,
/,
6Jfif
01
1
'
'
Q
u
\Ii,·~
,in___.
•
~
\
•
. j
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
. FORTHEEASTERNDISTRICTOFPENNSYLVANIA
.
GARY EDWARD HALL
CIVIL ACTION
~-
v.
NO. 17-3417
AFSCME, et al.
AND NOW,
--
ORDER
thi~J"day of September, 2017, upon considerationpt~
otion
SEP 26 2017
to amend original complaint (ECF No. 4), it is ORDERED that:
KAT~KMAN. Clerk
Oep. Clerk
1.
Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED.
2.
The Court will treat plaintiff's filing as an amended complaint. The amended
n
.,y~
complaint is DISMISSED for the reasons stated in the Court's memorandum.
3.
Plaintiff is given leave to file a second amended complaint within thirty (30) days
of the date of this order in the event he has exhausted remedies under the Federal Tort Claims
Act and has a basis for bringing a claim against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims
Act. If plaintiff files a second amended complaint, he shall describe how he exhausted his claims
and shall not raise any claims that were already resolved in prior lawsuits, including Civ. A. No.
10-5204. Any second amended complaint shall clearly state the basis for plaintiff's claims by
providing the dates on which the events in question occurred, stating where they occurred, and
describing who was involved and what happened. Upon the filing of a second am
z
complaint, the Clerk of Court shall not make service until so ORD ERE
qh6
1r 1 ~
rt «211
ECOURT:
-C.-D~-RN-----:,...._..,""'"""----
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?