J.H. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 29

ORDER THAT DEFT THOMAS O'NEILL'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO. 22) IS GRANTED. DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 4) IS DEEMED MOOT. THIS ACTION IS REMANDED TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILA. COUNTY FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; & THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 1/12/18. 1/17/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

J.H.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-3520

ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant Thomas
O’Neill’s Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 22), the Response of Defendants City of Philadelphia,
Charles Ramsey, and Richard Ross (Doc. No. 24), and Plaintiff’s Response in Support (Doc. No.
25), it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED.
2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4) is deemed MOOT.
3. This action is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
for all further proceedings; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall MARK THIS CASE CLOSED for all purposes,
including statistics.

BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE