NORTH AMERICAN ELITE INSURANCE COMPANY v. VICTORY FIRE PROTECTION, INC.

Filing 105

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT PENN BUILDERS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND BRIEFING IN SUPPORT THEREOF (ECF NOS. 97 & 103 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED, UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF VICTORY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 98 , DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 1/28/19. 1/29/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NORTH AMERICAN ELITE INSURANCE COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF PENN FOUNDATION, INC. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 17-3554 VICTORY FIRE PROTECTION, INC. , Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff v. PENN BUILDERS, INC. Third-Party Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2019, upon consideration of Third-Party Defendant Penn Builders’ Motion for Summary Judgment and briefing in support thereof (ECF Nos. 97 & 103), Plaintiff NAEIC’s response thereto (ECF No. 101), and Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Victory’s response thereto (ECF No. 102), it is hereby ORDERED that Third-Party Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, upon consideration of Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Victory’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 98) and Plaintiff NAEIC’s response thereto (ECF No. 100), Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/Wendy Beetlestone, J. _______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?