NORTH AMERICAN ELITE INSURANCE COMPANY v. VICTORY FIRE PROTECTION, INC.
Filing
105
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT PENN BUILDERS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND BRIEFING IN SUPPORT THEREOF (ECF NOS. 97 & 103 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED, UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF VICTORY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 98 , DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 1/28/19. 1/29/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NORTH AMERICAN ELITE INSURANCE
COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF PENN
FOUNDATION, INC.
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
v.
NO. 17-3554
VICTORY FIRE PROTECTION, INC. ,
Defendant/Third-Party
Plaintiff
v.
PENN BUILDERS, INC.
Third-Party
Defendant.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2019, upon consideration of Third-Party
Defendant Penn Builders’ Motion for Summary Judgment and briefing in support thereof (ECF
Nos. 97 & 103), Plaintiff NAEIC’s response thereto (ECF No. 101), and Defendant/Third-Party
Plaintiff Victory’s response thereto (ECF No. 102), it is hereby ORDERED that Third-Party
Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, upon consideration of Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff
Victory’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 98) and Plaintiff NAEIC’s response thereto
(ECF No. 100), Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Wendy Beetlestone, J.
_______________________________
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?