HERNANDEZ v. BERRYHILL
Filing
13
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR REMAND IS GRANTED AND THIS CASE IS REMANDED TO DEFENDANT FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS. THIS REMAND IS ORDER PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. 405 (g). THIS CASE IS HEREBY CLOSED ON THE COURT'S DOCKET; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 1/9/18. 1/9/18 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IRMA LUZ HERNANDEZ,
Plaintiff
v.
NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 17-3657
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant’s
contested motion for remand and Plaintiff’s reply thereto, I HEREBY ORDER that
Defendant’s motion is GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to Defendant for
further administrative proceedings.
Upon remand, the Appeals Council will affirm the portion of the Appeals
Council’s decision that is favorable to Plaintiff, direct the administrative law judge to
obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony for the “closed period” dating June 19,
2007 through June 2, 2011, and evaluate the issues presented in Plaintiff’s Request for
Review related to the “closed” time period.
This remand is ordered pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). This
is a final order. This case is hereby closed on the Court’s docket.
BY THE COURT:
/s J. William Ditter, Jr.
J. WILLIAM DITTER JR., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?