SCHWARTZ v. TAYLOR et al

Filing 101

FINAL ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S PRAECIPE TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT APRIL TAYLOR IS GRANTED. FINAL JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF SCHWARTZ AND AGAINST DEFENDANT APRIL TAYLOR IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $0 FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE AS TO EACH DEFENDANT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 10/15/21. 10/15/21 ENTERED AND E-MAILED,NOT MAILED TO UNREP AND PRO SE.(JL) (Main Document 101 replaced on 10/15/2021) (jl, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEVEN SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff, v. APRIL TAYLOR, et al., Defendants. : CIVIL ACTION : : : No. 17-3799 : : : FINAL ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Praecipe to Enter Default Judgment Against Defendant April Taylor (ECF No. 61), it is hereby ORDERED that his Praecipe is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Plaintiff Schwartz and against Defendant April Taylor in the total amount of $0 for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case as to each defendant.1 BY THE COURT /s/ Chad F. Kenney __________________________ CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE 1 April Taylor was the sole defendant remaining in the above-captioned matter. All other defendants were dismissed by Orders. See ECF No. 13 (Defendant Rocco Cipparone); ECF No. 36 (Linda Lane); ECF No. 43 (Jon Ludlam); and ECF No. 86 (Jeffrey Zucker).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?