FITZGERALD v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al

Filing 23

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS PENN LIBERTY BANK AND WSFS BANK (DOC. NO. 11 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: MOVING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT IS DENIED; AND MOVING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AND COUNT II IS DISMISSED AS ALLEGED AGAINST DEFENDANTS PENN LIBERTY BANK AND WSFS BANK. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 1/8/18. 1/9/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PETER R. FITZGERALD, Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-3842 ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Penn Liberty Bank and WSFS Bank (Doc. No. 11) and the Response of Plaintiff Peter R. Fitzgerald (Doc. No. 15), it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Moving Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count I of the Complaint is DENIED; and 2. Moving Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count II of the Complaint is GRANTED and Count II is DISMISSED as alleged against Defendants Penn Liberty Bank and WSFS Bank. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg ___________________________ MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?