ALLEYNE v. KAUFFMAN et al

Filing 14

ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/21/18. 8/22/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ADRIAN ALLEYNE, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT KAUFFMAN, et al., : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-4067 HABEAS CASE Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2018, upon consideration of the petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1), the respondents’ response (Doc. No. 10), and the petitioner’s reply (Doc. No. 11), and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin (Doc. No. 12), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED without prejudice and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing. 3. A certificate of appealability WILL NOT ISSUE. BY THE COURT /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?