S.F. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF UPPER DUBLIN
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO ENFORCE IS GRANTED AND THE CROSS-MOTION IS DENIED. THE PARTIES SHALL ABIDE BY THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 5/18/21. 5/18/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
S.F., by his Parents,
K.F. and E.I.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF UPPER
DUBLIN,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 17-4328
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of May 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s motion to
enforce consent decree and brief in support thereof (Docs. 62 & 63), Defendant’s response
in opposition thereto, which includes a cross-motion to modify the consent decree (Doc.
65), and Plaintiff’s response thereto (Doc. 68), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
motion to enforce is GRANTED and the cross-motion is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, with regard to revisions attributable to this
Order, the parties shall abide by the following schedule:
1. Defendant shall submit to Plaintiff revised construction drawings for the New
Middle School auditorium, with accompanying explanations that specifically
identify all proposed accessible paths and seating, within 30 days of the date of
the Order;
2. Plaintiff shall have 14 days from receipt of Defendant’s revised construction
plans and accompanying explanations in which to seek any clarifications from
Defendant, and Defendant shall have 14 days thereafter in which to respond;
and
3. Any unresolved dispute(s) must be the brought to the court’s attention on or
before August 31, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ ELIZABETH T. HEY
___________________________
ELIZABETH T. HEY, U.S.M.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?