WILLIAMS et al v. DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF PRISON INSPECTORS et al
ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. NOS. 19 AND 22) ARE GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PRO SE PLAINTIFF TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN 12/29/17. THE REMAINING SERVED DEFENDANTS SHALL NOT RESPOND TO THE PENDING AMENDED COMPLAINT UNITL THE EARLIER OF FOURTEEN (14) DAYS AFTER FILING OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SO AS TO ENSURE ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS REPSOND ON THE SAME TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, IF PLAIN TIFF ELECTS NOT TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, NO LATER THAN 1/8/18. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 11/28/17. 11/28/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED. (jpd )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF
PRISON INSPECTORS, et al.
AND NOW, this 281h day of November 2017, upon considering Defendant Corsi's and
the Sheriff Department's Motions to Dismiss (ECF Doc. Nos. 19, 22), Plaintiffs pro se
Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 29) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is
ORDERED the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Doc. Nos. 19, 22) are GRANTED
without prejudice for prose Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint no later than December
The remaining served Defendants shall not respond to the pending Amended
Complaint until the earlier of fourteen (14) days after filing of the Second Amended Complaint
so as to ensure all named Defendants respond on the same date to the Second Amended
Complaint or, if Plaintiff elects not to file a Second Amended Complaint, no later than January
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?