PASSARELLA v. CITIZEN'S BANK

Filing 12

OPINION/ORDER THAT THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 10) IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION. THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DOC. NO. 6) IS DENIED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 3/12/18. 3/12/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED. (ky, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM PASSARELLA, Plaintiff, v. CITIZEN’S BANK, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-4349 ORDER AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2018, after considering the amended complaint filed by the pro se plaintiff, William Passarella (Doc. No. 10); and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion; accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The amended complaint (Doc. No. 10) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; 1 2. The plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED; and 3. The clerk of court shall mark this matter as CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward G. Smith EDWARD G. SMITH, J. 1 This dismissal is without prejudice to the plaintiff refiling his claims in state court. The plaintiff may not file a second amended complaint in this case.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?