BORDERS v. SHARON HILL BOROUGH

Filing 36

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT SHARON HILL BOROUGH'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 30 ) IS GRANTED ONLY AS TO BORDER'S CLAIM FOR FIRST AMENDMENT RETALIATION UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983. BORDER'S REMAINING CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 6/25/2019. 6/26/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SUSAN BORDERS,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
2:17-cv-04429-AB

v.
SHARON HILL BOROUGH,
Defendant.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2019, it is ORDERED that:
1. Defendant Sharon Hill Borough’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 30) is
GRANTED only as to Borders’s claim for First Amendment retaliation under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983; and
2. Borders’s remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction.

_S/Anita B. Brody____
ANITA B. BRODY, J.
Copies VIA ECF on ___________

1