GARDNER v. SEPTA

Filing 47

ORDER: THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 40) IS GRANTED. ACCORDINGLY, PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS MATER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 10/17/2019. 10/17/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sme, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT GARDNER,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION

No. 17-4476

v.
SEPTA,

Defendant.
:-(~
AND NOW, this

\\

ORDER

day of October 2019, upon an independent review

of the record and upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary
Judgment and Memorandum of Law (ECF No. 40), Plaintiffs Memorandum of
Law in Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 43), Defendant's Reply Memorandum
of Law in Further Support of its Motion (ECF No. 44), and Plaintiffs Sur-reply in
Further Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 45), in conjunction with the Court's
accompanying Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40) is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiffs
Complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this mater.

BY THE COURT: