COLLINS v. EPSTEIN et al

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. MS. COLLINS MAY NOT FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS MATTER. MS. COLLINS'S REQUEST FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 1/11/2018. 1/12/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(amas) Modified on 1/12/2018 (lvj, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MURIEL COLLINS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. ALAN B. EPSTEIN, et al., Defendants. NO. 17-5098 ORDER AND NOW, this //1Laay of January, 2018, upon consideration of Ms. Collins' s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and her prose Complaint, it is ORDERED that: 1. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 2. The Complaint is DISMISSED for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum. Ms. Collins's employment discrimination claims are DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by res judicata. Her state law claims, including her legal malpractice claims, are DISMISSED without prejudice to her right to refile them in state court. Ms. Collins may not file an amended complaint in this matter. 3. Ms. Collins's request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT. 4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. /

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?