U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR IN-INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. CHETTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Filing
28
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IN MORTGAGE FORCLOSURE IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT AND THE MORTGAGED PROPERTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,528,586.55 TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL INTE REST, FEES AND EXPENSES FROM 4/1/18, TO THE DATE OF ANY MARSHAL'S OR OTHER JUDIDICAL SALE OF THE PROPERTY, LESS CREDIT TO DEFENDANT FOR ANY AND ALL PAYMENTS MADE ON THE LOAN SINCE 3/30/18; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 9/10/18. 9/10/18 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCATION,
AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY
MERGER TO LASALLE BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS
TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED
HOLDERS OF J.P. MORGAN CHASE
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES TRUST 2007-CIBC19,
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES
2007-CIBC19,
Plaintiff
CIVIL ACTION
N0.17-5127
v.
CHETTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant
ORDER
AND NOW, this
10th
day of September 2018, upon consideration of Plaintiffs motion
for summary judgment, [ECF 19], Defendant's opposition thereto, [ECF 21], and Plaintiffs
reply, [ECF 26], it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED and JUDMENT
IN MORTGAGE FORCLOSURE is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant and
the mortgaged property in the amount of $4,528,586.55, together with additional interest, fees
and expenses from April 1, 2018, to the date of any Marshal's or other judicial sale of the
property, less credit to Defendant for any and all payments made on the loan since March 30,
2018.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro
NITZA I. QUINONES ALEJANDRO, J.
Judge, United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?