U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR IN-INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. CHETTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Filing 28

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IN MORTGAGE FORCLOSURE IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT AND THE MORTGAGED PROPERTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,528,586.55 TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL INTE REST, FEES AND EXPENSES FROM 4/1/18, TO THE DATE OF ANY MARSHAL'S OR OTHER JUDIDICAL SALE OF THE PROPERTY, LESS CREDIT TO DEFENDANT FOR ANY AND ALL PAYMENTS MADE ON THE LOAN SINCE 3/30/18; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 9/10/18. 9/10/18 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCATION, AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF J.P. MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES TRUST 2007-CIBC19, COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-CIBC19, Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION N0.17-5127 v. CHETTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Defendant ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of September 2018, upon consideration of Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, [ECF 19], Defendant's opposition thereto, [ECF 21], and Plaintiffs reply, [ECF 26], it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED and JUDMENT IN MORTGAGE FORCLOSURE is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant and the mortgaged property in the amount of $4,528,586.55, together with additional interest, fees and expenses from April 1, 2018, to the date of any Marshal's or other judicial sale of the property, less credit to Defendant for any and all payments made on the loan since March 30, 2018. BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro NITZA I. QUINONES ALEJANDRO, J. Judge, United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?