DIXON v. LAW OFFICE OF J. SCOTT WATSON P.C.

Filing 51

ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF ALEXANDER DIXON FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR VIOLATION OF 15 U.S.C. 1692i. THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT J. SCOTT WATSON, P.C. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 8/7/18. 8/8/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALEXANDER DIXON
v.
J. SCOTT WATSON P.C.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 17-5236

ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2018, for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED
that:
1) the motion of plaintiff Alexander Dixon for summary
judgment (Doc. # 43) is GRANTED as follows:
a) summary judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff
Alexander Dixon and against defendant J. Scott
Watson P.C. for plaintiff’s claim for violation
of 15 U.S.C. § 1692i;
b) the motion of plaintiff Alexander Dixon for
summary judgment is otherwise DENIED on the
ground that genuine disputes of material fact
exist;
2) the motion of defendant J. Scott Watson P.C. for
summary judgment (Doc. # 44) is DENIED as follows:
a) the motion of defendant J Scott Watson P.C. for
summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim for

violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692i is DENIED as a
matter of law;
b) the motion of defendant J. Scott Watson for
summary judgment is otherwise DENIED on the
ground that genuine disputes of material fact
exist.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III
J.