BEIRD v. LINCOLN UNIVERSITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Filing 19

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, AS FOLLOWS THAT BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AS TO COUNTS IV, V, AND VI OF THE COMPLAINT; JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AS TO COUNT III OF THE COMPLAINT; AND DEFENDANTS MOTION IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 9/17/20. 9/17/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TRACY L. BEIRD
v.
LINCOLN UNIVERSITY OF THE
COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER
EDUCATION

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-5303

ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2020, upon consideration of Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition thereto (ECF
No. 14), and Defendant’s Reply (ECF No. 16), it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:
1.

By agreement of the parties, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant as to
Counts IV, V, and VI of the Complaint;

2.

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant as to Count III of the Complaint; and

3.

Defendant’s Motion is DENIED in all other respects.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:
_/s/ R. Barclay Surrick_______
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.