GARCIA v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
Filing
3
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ARE GRANTED; THE COMPLAINTS IN ALL THREE OF THE ABOVE CASES ARE DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS AND MALICIOUS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1915(E)(2)(B)(I) AND (II) FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE EACH CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 12/8/17. 12/11/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION
HAMLET GARCIA, JR.
Plaintiff,
v.
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, et al.
Defendants.
NO. 17-5324
HAMLET GARCIA, JR.
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
v.
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,
Defendants.
NO. 17-5325
HAMLET GARCIA, JR.
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACITON
v.
CHRISTINA A. KING,
Defendant.
NO. 17-5326
ORDER
AND NOW, this !
-7/~ay of December, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiffs motions
to proceed informa pauperis and his prose complaints in the above cases, it is ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiffs motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are GRANTED.
2.
The complaints in all three of the above cases are DISMISSED as frivolous and
malicious, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) for the reasons discussed in the
Court's memorandum. Plaintiff is not given leave to file an amended complaint in any of the
three cases.
3.
The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE each case.
BY THE COURT:
GERALD A. MCHUGH,
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?