WADLEY v. KIDDIE ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
Filing
29
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION ECF NO. 25 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: 1. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST KIDDIE ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL, INC., CHRISTINA RECCA, RUCHI SRIVASTAVA AND LISA ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. COUNT S 1, 2, 5, AND 6 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT 4 AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST ESSENTIAL BRANDS, INC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 10/01/2018. 10/01/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JANASIA WADLEY,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 17-05745
v.
KIDDIE ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL,
INC., et al
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2018, upon consideration of Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 25), Plaintiff’s
Response (ECF No. 26), and Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 27), it is ORDERED that
Defendants’ Motion (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as
follows:
1. All claims against Kiddie Academy International, Inc., Christina Recca,
Ruchi Srivastava and Lisa are DISMISSED with prejudice.
2. Counts 1, 2, 5 and 6 are DISMISSED with prejudice.
3. The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Count 4 and all claims
against Essential Brands, Inc.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?