WADLEY v. KIDDIE ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al

Filing 29

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION ECF NO. 25 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: 1. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST KIDDIE ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL, INC., CHRISTINA RECCA, RUCHI SRIVASTAVA AND LISA ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. COUNT S 1, 2, 5, AND 6 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT 4 AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST ESSENTIAL BRANDS, INC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 10/01/2018. 10/01/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JANASIA WADLEY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-05745 v. KIDDIE ACADEMY INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2018, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 25), Plaintiff’s Response (ECF No. 26), and Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 27), it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. All claims against Kiddie Academy International, Inc., Christina Recca, Ruchi Srivastava and Lisa are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. Counts 1, 2, 5 and 6 are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Count 4 and all claims against Essential Brands, Inc. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?