SANTIAGO v. LINK et al

Filing 27

ORDER OF 3/11/2019 THAT THE CORRECTION DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 14, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; DEFENDANT WEINER'S MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 17, IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIMS ACT CLAIMS, AS TO DE FENDANTS KORSZNIAK, GROSSMAN, C. LINK, PEURIFOY, KNAPP AND WEINER ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; DEFENDANT WEINER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 25, IS DISMISSED AS MOOT; THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WILL BE STAYED WHILE COUNSEL IS SOUGHT; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO REFER THIS MATTER TO THE PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS PANEL TO ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, ETC. THIS CASE IS STAYED PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF COURT. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/11/2019. 3/12/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(DT)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : NELSON G. SANTIAGO, : Plaintiff, : : v. : : SUPERINTENDENT CYNTHIA LINK; : JOE KORSZNIAK, Correctional Health : Care Administrator; : DR. WEINER, MDO of Correct Care : Solutions; : BOB GROSSMAN, Nurse Supervisor; : RN JAIME LINK, Subordinate; : CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MEREDITH; : CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PUFORY; 1 : CORRECTIONAL OFFICER AUSTIN; and : CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LT. KNAPP, : Defendants. : : No. 2:17-cv-05788 ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Complaint, ECF No. 6; the Corrections Defendants’ 2 Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 14; the Corrections Defendants’ Memorandum supporting the Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 15; Defendant Weiner’s Motion to Dismiss and Brief in support, ECF No. 17; and Plaintiff’s Response to the Corrections Defendants’ Motion, ECF No. 23, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Corrections Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 14, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. Defendant Weiner’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 17, is GRANTED; 1 The correct spelling of this Defendant’s name is Peurifoy. Defendants C. Link, Korzniak, J. Link, Knapp, Meredith, Peurifoy, Grossman, and Austin (the “Corrections Defendants”). 2 1 031119 3. Plaintiff’s Civil Rights Act Claims, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as to Defendants Korszniak, Grossman, C. Link, Peurifoy, Knapp, and Weiner are DISMISSED without prejudice; 4. Defendant Weiner’s Motion for Summary Judgement, ECF No. 25, is DISMISSED as moot; 5. The deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint will be stayed while counsel is sought; 6. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to refer this matter to the Prisoner Civil Rights Panel to attempt to obtain counsel for Plaintiff; 3 and 7. This case is STAYED pending further order of Court. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr. JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge 3 The Court is referring this action to this district’s Prisoner Civil Rights Panel to attempt to find a volunteer attorney willing to represent Santiago. However, the Court cannot compel an attorney to represent him, and there is no guarantee that an attorney will agree to accept his case. Accordingly, Santiago will have to wait to see if an attorney on the Panel is willing to accept his case.a 2 031119

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?