BEAUTYMAN et al v. LAURENT et al

Filing 73

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW (DOC. 70 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 10/31/2019. 11/1/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL J. BEAUTYMAN and MICHAEL J. BEAUTYMAN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiffs, v. DAVID LAURENT, a/k/a, DAVID J. LEHARVEO, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 17-5804 ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant David Laurent, a/k/a, David J. Leharveo’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Plaintiffs Michael J. Beautyman and Michael J. Beautyman Family Limited Partnership’s Response in Opposition, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion (Doc. No. 70) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Robert F. Kelly ROBERT F. KELLY SENIOR JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?