BEAUTYMAN et al v. LAURENT et al
Filing
73
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW (DOC. 70 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 10/31/2019. 11/1/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL J. BEAUTYMAN and MICHAEL
J. BEAUTYMAN FAMILY LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DAVID LAURENT, a/k/a, DAVID J.
LEHARVEO,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 17-5804
ORDER
AND NOW, this
31st
day of October, 2019, upon consideration of
Defendant David Laurent, a/k/a, David J. Leharveo’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter
of Law and Plaintiffs Michael J. Beautyman and Michael J. Beautyman Family Limited
Partnership’s Response in Opposition, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion (Doc.
No. 70) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
SENIOR JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?