SMITH v. BERRYHILL

Filing 16

ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. SECTION 405(G) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARACAPPA'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3/14/19. 3/14/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHARON SMITH o/b/o TM, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 18-113 ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff Sharon Smith's First Motion for Summary Judgment and Request for Review (Doc. No. 11), Defendant Nancy Berryhill's Response (Doc. No. 13), and the administrative record, and after careful consideration of Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14), to which no objections were filed, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 1 2. Plaintiffs Request for Review (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Caracappa's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14); and 3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes, including statistics. Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.l(IV)(b) and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l), Acting Commissioner Berryhill had fourteen (14) days to object to the Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation was issued on January 30, 2019, and Acting Commissioner Berryhill has not objected to it.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?