PEARCE v. MIZUHO BANK, LTD. et al

Filing 25

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT KARPELE' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 7/26/19. 7/26/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
____________________________________
:
GREGORY PEARCE, individually and on :
behalf of all others similarly situated,
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
No. 18-306
:
MARK KARPELES, an individual,
:
:
Defendant.
:
___________________________________ :

ORDER
AND NOW, this

26th

day of July, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant

Mark Karpeles’ (“Karpeles”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure § 12(b)(2), (Doc. No. 20), Plaintiff Gregory Pearce’s (“Pearce”)
Response in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, and Karpeles’ Reply to Pearce’s Response in
Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
SENIOR JUDGE