SALLAM v. GILMORE et al
Filing
30
ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 3/23/20. 3/23/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SHAMSIDDIN SALLAM,
CIVIL ACTION
Petitioner,
v.
ROBERT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF
PHILADELPHIA AND THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
PENNSYLVANIA,
NO. 18-448
Respondent.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 23RD day of MARCH, 2020 upon careful and independent
consideration of the pleadings and available state court records, and after review of the Report
and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is ORDERED
that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED;
3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a
substantial showing of the denial o f a constitutional right nor demonstrated that
reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this ruling.
See 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,484 (2000); and
The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Wendy Beetlestone, J.
__
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?