DANIELS v. GARMAN et al

Filing 36

ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE MOTION TO EXPAND THE RECORD IS DENIED; NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE; AND THIS CASE SHALL BE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 5/5/20. 5/5/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )

Case 2:18-cv-00687-GJP Document 36 Filed 05/05/20 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
EDWARD N. DANIELS,
Petitioner,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 18-00687

v.
MARK GARMAN, et al.,
Respondents.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2020, upon consideration of Edward N.
Daniels’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1.), Respondents’ Response
(ECF No. 13), Petitioner’s Reply (ECF No. 22.), the Report and Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley (ECF No. 23), and Petitioner’s
Objections (ECF No. 30) and Motion to Expand the Record (ECF No. 32), it is
ORDERED that:
1.

The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2.

The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED
with prejudice;

3.

The Motion to Expand the Record is DENIED;

4.

No certificate of appealability shall issue; and

5.

This case shall be CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
________________________
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.