M.B. v. SCHUYLKILL COUNTY et al
Filing
80
ORDER GRANTING J.W.'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 57 AND M.B.'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION 64 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ENFORCEMENT OF THIS ORDER SHALL BE STAYED FOR 14 DAYS TO ALLOW THE PARTIES AND J.W. TO SUBMIT PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER CURRENTLY IN PLACE. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 4/24/2019. 4/24/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sfl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
M.B.,A MINOR,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
v.
SCHUYLKILL COUNTY et al.,
Defendants.
No. 18-756
ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of non-party J.W.'s Motion
for Protective Order (Doc. No. 57), the responses thereto (Doc. Nos. 60, 61, and 62), Plaintiff
M.B. 's Motion to Compel Production (Doc. No. 64), the response thereto (Doc. No. 65), and the
parties' Status Report (Doc. No. 76), it is ORDERED that, as described in the Court's April 24,
2019 Memorandum:
1. J.W.'s Motion for Protective Order (Doc. No. 57) is GRANTED;
2. M.B. 's Motion to Compel Production (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED; and
3. Enforcement of this Order shall be STAYED for fourteen (14) days to allow the
parties and J.W. to submit proposed revisions to the protective order currently in
place. See Doc. No. 33. 1
BY THE COURT:
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court directs the parties and J.W. to prepare a joint proposed revised protective
order. If the parties and J.W. are unable to craft a joint proposal, they may submit individual
proposals if absolutely necessary.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?