HTA-SCW WEBB MEDICAL A LLC et al v. ROSKAMP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC et al

Filing 75

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ROSKAMP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, ROBERT G. ROSKAM, PHILIP D. KALTENBACHER, PAUL H. WOODRUFF, DANIEL SAVICK, WHITELAND HOLDIN GS LP, FRAZER EXTON DEVELOPMENT LP, AND WHITELAND VILLAGE LIMITED AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF WITH RESPECT TO THE RICO CLAIMS AT CLAIM NINE OF PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT; AND THE REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIMS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS, AT CLAIMS ONE THROUGH EIGH T AND CLAIMS TEN THROUGH TWELVE OF PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT, ARE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AS THIS COURT DECLINES TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THEM PURSUANT TO 28 USC SEC. 1367(c)(3). THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 4/14/20. 4/15/20 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPIES NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL. (fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HTA-SCW WEBB MEDICAL A LLC, et al. Plaintiffs : : : : : : : v. ROSKAMP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, et al. Defendants CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1100 : ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of April 2020, upon consideration of Defendants’ motions for summary judgment, [ECF 48-53], Plaintiffs’ response in opposition thereto, [ECF 58, 60], and Defendants’ replies, [ECF 63, 64, 66, 67], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion: 1. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are GRANTED and JUDGMENT is entered in favor Defendants Roskamp Management Company, Robert G. Roskam, Philip D. Kaltenbacher, Paul H. Woodruff, Daniel Sevick, Whiteland Holdings LP, Frazer Exton Development LP, and Whiteland Village Limited and against Plaintiff with respect to the RICO claims at Claim Nine of Plaintiffs’ complaint; and 2. the remaining state law claims against all Defendants, at Claims One through Eight and Claims Ten through Twelve of Plaintiffs’ complaint, are DISMISSED, without prejudice, as this Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over them pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1367(c)(3). The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?