H2O RESOURCES, LLC v. OILFIELD TRACKING SERVICES, LLC et al

Filing 36

ORDER THAT CARRIZO'S MOTION TO DISMISS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OR, ALTERNATIVELY, TO TRANSFER VENUE 22 IS GRANTED; OTS, DREW GLADULICH, AND THOMAS GLADULICH'S MOTION 27 IS GRANTED; WILKERSON'S MOTION 31 IS GRANTED; CARRIZO'S M OTION TO FILE A REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT 32 IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF H20 RESOURCES, LLC'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL PARTIES SHALL ENGAGE IN THE ADR PROCEDURES, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 6/22/18. 6/22/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

H2O RESOURCES, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
OILFIELD TRACKING SERVICES, LLC,
CARRIZO OIL & GAS, INC.,
DREW GLADULICH,
THOMAS GLADULICH, and
THOMAS WILKERSON,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 18-1164

ORDER
AND NOW, this

22nd day of June, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant

Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.’s (“Carrizo”) Motion to Dismiss to Compel Arbitration or, Alternatively,
to Transfer Venue, Defendants Oilfield Tracking Services, LLC (“OTS”), Drew Gladulich, and
Thomas Gladulich’s Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration, Defendant Thomas Wilkerson’s
(“Wilkerson”) Motion to Join Carrizo’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint to Compel
Arbitration, Carrizo’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to
Dismiss the Complaint, and all of the responses and replies, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

Carrizo’s Motion to Dismiss to Compel Arbitration or, Alternatively, to
Transfer Venue (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED to the extent it seeks to
compel the alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) procedures as set forth
in § 10.3 of the 2014 Master Service Agreement;

2.

OTS, Drew Gladulich, and Thomas Gladulich’s Motion (Doc. No. 27) is
GRANTED;

3.

Wilkerson’s Motion (Doc. No. 31) is GRANTED;

4.

Carrizo’s Motion to File a Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to
Dismiss the Complaint (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED;

5.

Plaintiff H2O Resources, LLC’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE; and

6.

the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case statistically.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties shall engage in the ADR
procedures as set forth in § 10.3 of the 2014 Master Service Agreement.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
SENIOR JUDGE

2