WARREN HILL, LLC v. SFR EQUITIES, LLC
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT SFR EQUITIES, LLC FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF WARREN HILL, LLC FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE COUNTERCLAIM OF SFR IS DISMISSED AS MOOT BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 7/23/2019. 7/23/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WARREN HILL, LLC
v.
SFR EQUITIES, LLC
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 18-1228
ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2019, for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED
that:
(1)
the motion of defendant SFR Equities, LLC (“SFR”)
for partial summary judgment regarding all direct payments to
BCM as trust certificate holder is DENIED;
(2)
the motion of plaintiff Warren Hill, LLC (“Warren
Hill”) for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent that SFR is
required to include the Blue Cross Blue Shield bonus payments
made to Brian Hynes in its calculation of earnout payments due
to Warren Hill pursuant to § 1.2(d)(ii)(D) of the Membership
Interest Purchase Agreement (“MIPA”);
(3)
the motion of plaintiff Warren Hill for summary
judgment is GRANTED to the extent that SFR is required to
include fees paid by the Vendor Assistance Program to Bluestone
Capital Markets (“BCM”) and Bluestone Finance in SFR’s
calculation of earnout payments due to Warren Hill pursuant to
§ 1.2(d)(i)(A)(1) of the MIPA;
(4)
the motion of plaintiff Warren Hill for summary
judgment is GRANTED to the extent that SFR is required to
include an amount equal to 16.623% of the trust certificate
income in SFR’s calculation of earnout payments due to Warren
Hill pursuant to § 1.2(e)(iii) of the MIPA; and
(5)
the counterclaim of SFR is dismissed as moot by
agreement of the parties.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Harvey Bartle III
J.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?