WARREN HILL, LLC v. SFR EQUITIES, LLC

Filing 92

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT SFR EQUITIES, LLC FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF WARREN HILL, LLC FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE COUNTERCLAIM OF SFR IS DISMISSED AS MOOT BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 7/23/2019. 7/23/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WARREN HILL, LLC v. SFR EQUITIES, LLC : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1228 ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2019, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of defendant SFR Equities, LLC (“SFR”) for partial summary judgment regarding all direct payments to BCM as trust certificate holder is DENIED; (2) the motion of plaintiff Warren Hill, LLC (“Warren Hill”) for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent that SFR is required to include the Blue Cross Blue Shield bonus payments made to Brian Hynes in its calculation of earnout payments due to Warren Hill pursuant to § 1.2(d)(ii)(D) of the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (“MIPA”); (3) the motion of plaintiff Warren Hill for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent that SFR is required to include fees paid by the Vendor Assistance Program to Bluestone Capital Markets (“BCM”) and Bluestone Finance in SFR’s calculation of earnout payments due to Warren Hill pursuant to § 1.2(d)(i)(A)(1) of the MIPA; (4) the motion of plaintiff Warren Hill for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent that SFR is required to include an amount equal to 16.623% of the trust certificate income in SFR’s calculation of earnout payments due to Warren Hill pursuant to § 1.2(e)(iii) of the MIPA; and (5) the counterclaim of SFR is dismissed as moot by agreement of the parties. BY THE COURT: /s/ Harvey Bartle III J. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?