DOE et al v. ARMSTRONG

Filing 167

ORDERED THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT MARTIN ARMSTRONG FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURTS MAY 19, 2020 ORDER GRANTING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT HERITAGE NUMISMATIC AUCTIONS, INC. (DOC. # 145) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 8/3/20. 8/3/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )

Case 2:18-cv-01263-HB Document 167 Filed 08/03/20 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GEORGE ANTONIAK, et al.
v.
MARTIN ARMSTRONG,
v.
HERITAGE NUMISMATIC AUCTIONS,
INC.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 18-1263

ORDER
And now, this

3rd day of August 2020, for the reasons

set forth in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED
that the motion of defendant Martin Armstrong for
reconsideration of this Court’s May 19, 2020 Order granting
reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to third-party defendant
Heritage Numismatic Auctions, Inc. (Doc. # 145) is DENIED.1

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III
_____________________
J.

The Court must still determine what amount of counsel fees
and costs to award Heritage.
1