PRICE v. COMMONWEALTH CHARTER ACADEMY

Filing 35

MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S RETALIATION CLAIM AT COUNT IV IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 21 ) IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 20 ) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 8/13/2019. 8/14/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION

MARY E. PRICE
Plaintiff, prose

NO. 18-1778
v.

COMMONWEALTH CHARTER
ACADEMY-CYBERSCHOOL
Defendant

ORDER
AND NOW, this 13 th day of August 2019, upon consideration of Defendant's motion for

summary judgment, [ECF 20], Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, 1 [ECF 21], and all
documents filed in connection therewith, [ECF 24, 25, 31-33], 2 it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiffs retaliation claim at Count IV is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter
jurisdiction;
2. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, [ECF 21], is DENIED; and
3. Defendant's motion for summary judgment, [ECF 20], is GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:

Isl Nitza I. Quinones Aleiandro
NITZA I. QUINONES ALEJANDRO
Judge, United States District Court

The Court is treating Plaintiff's memorandum for summary judgment on the administrative record,
[ECF 21], as a motion for summary judgment.
2

These documents include the parties' respective responses to the summary judgment motions, [ECF
24, 25], the parties' Court-ordered supplemental briefs concerning Plaintiff's retaliation claim, [ECF 31,
32], and Plaintiff's response to Defendant's supplemental brief. [ECF 33).