SAJID v. IJAZ et al

Filing 36

ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF MUHAMMAD SAJID, AND AGIANST DEFENDANT MOHAMMAD IJAZ, IN THE AMOUNT OF $56,000 FOR COMPENSATORY DAMAGES FOR COMMON LAW FRAUD. JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF MUHAMMAD SAJID, AND AGI ANST DEFENDANT MOHAMMAD IJAZ, IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000 FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES FOR COMMON LAW FRAUD. JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF MUHAMMAD SAJID, AND AGAINST DEFENDANT MOHAMMAD IJAZ, FOR COMMON LAW BREACH OF CONTRACT. JUDGMENT BE ENTER ED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT MOHAMMAD IJAZ AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF MUHAMMAD SAJID FOR COMMON LAW UNJUST ENRICHEMENT, VIOLATIONS OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT, AND VIOLATIONS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA WAGE PAYMENT AND COLLECTION LAW. JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT SHAISTA IJAZ AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF MUHAMMAD SAJID ON ALL COUNTS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 8/9/2019. 8/13/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MUHAMMAD SAJID,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION

v.
MOHAMMAD IJAZ AND SHAISTA IJAZ,
Defendants.

NO. 18-1899

ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Proposed
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (ECF No. 30), Defendants’ Response (ECF No. 33),
and Plaintiff’s Reply (ECF No. 34), and following a bench trial, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff Muhammad Sajid, and against Defendant
Mohammad Ijaz, in the amount of $56,000 for compensatory damages for common law
fraud;
2. Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff Muhammad Sajid, and against Defendant
Mohammad Ijaz, in the amount of $50,000 for punitive damages for common law fraud;
3. Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff Muhammad Sajid, and against Defendant
Mohammad Ijaz, for common law breach of contract.
4. Judgment be entered in favor of Defendant Mohammad Ijaz and against Plaintiff
Muhammad Sajid for common law unjust enrichment, violations of the Fair Labor
Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, and violations of the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and
Collection Law, 43 Pa. C.S.A. § 260.9a(b).
5. Judgment be entered in favor of Defendant Shaista Ijaz and against Plaintiff Muhammad
Sajid on all counts.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
BY THE COURT:

/s/Wendy Beetlestone, J.
_______________________________
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.