BURKE v. DEPUY SYNTHES COMPANIES et al

Filing 34

MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT JOHNSON & JOHNSON IS DISMISSED FROM THE ACTION. DEFENDANT DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED/ PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO STRIKE A CLAUSE WITHIN PARAGRAPH 59 OF DEFENDANTS' "STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS" (DOC. NO. 25 -3) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/30/20. 6/30/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KIMBERLY BURKE, Plaintiff, v. DEPUY SYNTHES COMPANIES, ET AL., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 18-cv-2068 ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 25), the response and reply thereto (ECF Nos. 31, 32), and for the reasons set forth in my accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Upon the agreement of the parties, Defendant Johnson & Johnson is DISMISSED from the action. 2. Defendant DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff’s request to strike a clause within paragraph 59 of Defendants’ “Statement of Undisputed Material Facts” (ECF No. 25-3) is GRANTED. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?