SHELTON v. TARGET ADVANCE LLC
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 21 IS GRANTED, IN PART, AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS III AND IV, AND COUNTS III AND IV ARE DISMISSED FOR A LACK OF STANDING; AND THE MOTION IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. DEFENDANT SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 4/16/19. 4/16/19 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Plaintiff
v.
TARGET ADVANCE LLC
Defendant
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 18-2070
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of April 2019, upon consideration of Defendant’s motion to
dismiss, [ECF 21], Plaintiff’s response in opposition, [ECF 22], this Court’s Order converting
Defendant’s motion into a motion for summary judgment and allowing supplemental briefing,
[ECF 23], Defendant’s supplemental brief, [ECF 24], and Plaintiff’s supplemental brief, [ECF
25], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum
Opinion, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED, in part, as follows:
(1) the motion is GRANTED with respect to Counts III and IV, and Counts III and
IV are dismissed for a lack of standing; and
(2) the motion is DENIED in all other respects.
Defendant shall file an answer to the amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of this
Order.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro
NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO
Judge, United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?