BOOKARD v. THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES, INC. et al

Filing 55

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT MANPOWER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 35 ) IS GRANTED. NORTHTEC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 34 ) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. MANPOWER'S COUNTERCLAIM FOR CONTRACTUAL INDEMNIFICATION IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. NORTHTEC'S MOTION IN LIMINE (DOC. NO. 43 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. MANPOWER'S MOTION IN LIMINE (DOC. NO. 44 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. NORTHTEC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY BRIEF (DOC. NO. 49 ) IS GRANTED INSOFAR AS THE COURT CONSIDERED NORTHTEC'S PROPOSED SUR-REPLY BRIEF IN RULING ON MANPOWER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/10/2020. 3/11/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALEXIS BOOKARD
v.
THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES,
INC., et al.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 18-2424

ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of March, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants/Third-Party
Plaintiffs Northtec LLC and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.’s (collectively, Northtec) Motion
for Summary Judgment, Third-Party Defendant Manpower, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment,
the briefing on the Motions, and the parties’ presentations at the August 20, 2019, oral argument,
and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:


Manpower’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 35) is GRANTED. Judgment
will be entered in Manpower’s favor on Northtec’s Third-Party Claims against
Manpower by separate order.



Northtec’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 34) is DISMISSED as moot.
Manpower’s Counterclaim for Contractual Indemnification is DISMISSED as moot.

It is further ORDERED:


Northtec’s Motion in Limine (Document 43) is DENIED as moot;



Manpower’s Motion in Limine (Document 44) is DENIED as moot; and



Northtec’s Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply Brief (Document 49) is GRANTED
insofar as the Court considered Northtec’s proposed Sur-Reply Brief in ruling on
Manpower’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, C.J.

2